Nonetheless, Elon Musk Is Our Guy
Nonetheless, Elon Musk Is Our Guy
Owner of the X platform, remaining the final hope against censorship, sometimes bends and kneels. But he remains one of few vocal about the so-called ‘establishment class.’
In the ongoing saga for free speech between the Zionists and the nationalists, Elon Musk told CNBC’s Andrew Ross Sorkin that the companies participating in advertiser boycotts from his X platform could “go f***” themselves.
The interview rocked the establishment journalist at The New York Times Dealbook Summit so much that he was speechless. The mainstream media responded by calling the billionaire a lunatic, focusing on the antisemitic accusations that have been unloaded on Musk since his takeover of Twitter.
Prior to the interview, Musk traveled to Israel for a tour of an Israeli kibbutz attacked by Hamas on October 7. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu provided as his guide brought him around different locations involved in the Hamas attack.
Critics viewed the trip as an apology tour, but Musk denied the claim. Others were not content with the trip as Esther Solomon, editor-in-chief of Haaretz, called Musk a “blatant antisemite & publisher of antisemitism,” rebuking Netanyahu for entertaining the visit.
Can Elon Musk ever get in their good graces?
No. Let’s look at the past.
I. #BanTheADL
It all started back in September when Musk posted that the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) had tried to “strangle X/Twitter,” as it is notoriously known as the “arbiter of the truth,” deeming what is “right” and what is “wrong.”
Writer for the Unz Review, Keith Woods, an Irish nationalist, initiated the spur by garnering Musk’s attention:
A simple acknowledgment of Woods’ post by Musk initiated the war for free speech between the nationalists and the establishment Zionists. And so, after over 150,000 posts on X with #BanTheADL, the nonprofit condemned the hashtag as being leveraged by “white supremacists” and “antisemites,” reported Mashable.
Further Reading: Musk Must Decide to Own or Be Owned
II. Musk’s First Talk with Netanyahu
Later that month, as the mainstream media and the ADL continued to attack Musk for his promise of free speech, the owner of X met with Israel’s prime minister to talk about “AI.” The discussion, however, became more about antisemitism on the social media platform.
While Musk was making his rounds with Bibi, an anti-Zionist Jewish organization took to the podium. The Central Rabbinical Congress of the US and Canada (CRC), a consortium of Haredi Jewish groups based in Brooklyn, NY, slammed the ADL, claiming it politicized antisemitism.
The CRC asserted that Zionist NGOs like the ADL silence criticism of Jews or anything connected to the group, including public policy (Israel/Zionism).
Recall the ADL claimed in its blog any insinuation of power or influence regarding mega geopolitical donor George Soros is a manipulation “for malign purposes … of mainstreaming antisemitic tropes.”
Other anti-Zionist Jewish groups, like True Torah Jews, agreed with the CRC and rebuked the methods of Zionist nonprofits, saying they stoke fear in the Jewish people to encourage the need for the State of Israel.
Even President Joe Biden seems to agree after saying:
I think without Israel, there’s not a Jew in the world who’s secure.
True Torah Jews noted that the corporate media assists by melding “Israel” with “Jew,” which “fortifies the position of both Zionists and antisemites.”
Further Reading: Orthodox Jews Expose Zionist ‘Antisemitism’ Racket of ADL
III. Ben Shapiro and the Nine Jewish Elders
Still, none of the efforts by the Zionists were enough to push Musk into censorship, so The Daily Wire’s premier commentator and staunch Zionist Ben Shapiro invited him into an X space to discuss “antisemitism, faith and free speech.”
The two-hour discourse essentially reduced the gentile billionaire to his knees to comply with their grievances. The 10 Jews warned Musk he would continue to lose advertisers as “hidden antisemitism” was on the rise.
Musk disagreed with their claims and pushed for organic enforcement, but they insisted he did not understand the “Jewish experience,” which “formed the backbone of the American experience.”
Still, they pushed for much of the same that the ADL had been advocating for on the platform. Rabbi Menachem Margolin of the European Jewish Association (EJA) even insisted Musk needed to visit Auschwitz to understand “antisemitism and what it could lead to.” He also pushed for the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (HIRA) “working definition” of antisemitism—which is tremendously broad and includes criticism of Zionism.
Adopting such a measure would render so-called “pro-Palestine” narratives “hate,” requiring censorship, thus establishing the dominance of mainstream media’s pro-Israel “reporting.”
Further Reading: Elon Musk Cornered by Ben Shapiro's Jewish Leaders to Repent (TOWNHALL CENSORED)
IV. Musk ADL Lawsuit Threat
During the #BanTheADL campaign, Musk threatened to sue the ADL over lost revenue due to the nonprofit’s advertiser boycotts. He said advertising sales had been down 60% and that he had “no choice but to file a defamation lawsuit against the Anti-Defamation League …”
Musk never followed through with the lawsuit and appears to be in good standing with the ADL at the moment. ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt told Mediaite:
It’s important that he made a good policy decision and announced that he was no longer going to tolerate language … genocidal language that call to eradicate the State of Israel and annihilate the 7 million people who live there.
Still, that certainly doesn’t mean Musk or X is in the clear, as Zionists from across the aisle look to curb alternative narratives during the conflict in the Middle East.
V. Musk and Allegations of Jewish Antiwhitism
The battle never seems to end with Musk. In November, the owner of X found himself in hot water after agreeing with a post on the platform that claimed replacement theory and antiwhitism were being perpetrated by Jews.
Back in July, Musk responded to a video of South Africa’s EFF leader Julius Malema chanting, “Shoot to kill, kill the Boer, kill the farmer,” to nearly 100,000 cheers at the FNB Stadium. He referred to it as “genocide” and tagged the ADL in the post for hopeful action.
The ADL does not acknowledge the genocide of Whites in South Africa. In 2017, Senior Research Fellow at the ADL’s Center of Extremism Mark Pitcavage stated the murders were a “racist obsession” and a “white supremacist claim.” Greenblatt affirmed Pitcavage’s statement, going so far as to defend the “Kill the Boer” chant.
He said the whole thing is “baseless claims of ‘white genocide’ … made by right-wing extremists in the US, particularly white supremacists …”
VI. Falling Support for Israel
Amid the decline in support for Israel, mainstream media had begun to point the finger at social media platforms. CBS News published a story about “teachers confront[ing] misinformation on social media as they teach about Israel and Gaza.”
A Deloitte survey found that 51% of Gen Z teens use social media for news. Corporate media scrambling to retain its power over public discourse claimed these platforms empower so-called “misinformation” and “hate.”
Musk had pushed the establishment back on its heels, as with his platform, the truth would no longer be curtailed or “modified” to fit the regime’s agenda.
The Post alleged social media outlets like FaceBook and Instagram over-endorsed pro-Palestine content. Others followed suit; Forbes said TikTok promoted pro-Palestinian content.
X certainly won’t remain free from the same treatment, especially after Musk’s latest “f u” to the establishment. No Big Tech platform is truly safe while legacy media struggles to preserve its “rightful” reign in the digital sphere. Congressional hearings could be inbound, particularly targeting Musk as the war continues to wage on and support dwindles.
VII. Lawsuit against Media Matters
Far-left nonprofit Media Matters claimed X was running ads next to “pro-Nazi” content, which triggered an advertiser boycott. Musk denied the allegations, saying that Media Matters “exploited” the platform by “excessive scrolling,” resulting in the curation of “fringe” content, reported Axios.
The lawsuit states, “The overall effect on advertisers and users was to create the false, misleading perception that these types of pairings were common, widespread, and alarming.”
Republican Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton offered his support to Musk after he posted on X that he is “opening an investigation into Media Matters for potential fraudulent activity.”
VIII. Where We Stand
Elon Musk has been through the mill the past few months, and although he hasn’t been as firm as free speech advocates would have wanted, he has still held his own considering the circumstances.
The multi-billionaire will continue to be tested, so he needs all the support he can muster. Allowing the censorious to prevail is negging on the America First agenda.
Musk will have his ups, downs, wins and losses—but that doesn’t mean the people should give up hope on his promise of free speech. This battle goes beyond the First Amendment, which has declared war on the truth and, as a result, protects those who hold America hostage.