Optics Surrounding Harvard DEI Scandal Put a Tailspin on the Truth
Harvard's ex-president, Dr. Claudine Gay, wasn't fired for plagiarism or because of racism. Neither was her ousting a conservative win against DEI.
Conservative America, wake up to the “globalist” regime that reigns supreme over our nation, says Alex Jones repeatedly to his audience.
Who are the “globalists”? It’s a rather obscure term of Jones’, and that is for good reason.
Accusations lie heavier than the actual convictions.
He is softly referring to the Zionists. They’ve been center stage of most of the media coverage for the past few months. They were recently successful in a campaign to remove former Harvard President Dr. Claudine Gay. The supposed reason for her forced resignation can be found in Chris Brunet’s Substack, Karlstack, which reveals she had plagiarised academic work.
There were two dominant reactions to Gay’s resignation: a win for Con Inc. over diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) and a setback in racial justice, solely blamed upon White people and even Christians.
Let’s be honest. Gay was fired because of the Zionist influence. She allowed “counter-Semitism,” which is an institutional no-no. Few will admit this reality because the reaction is, like other protected classes, to cry “fowl.” In the United States, it is deemed basically immoral to criticize Israel, Zionism and the Jewish people. Gay bypassed that line, permitting her students to show support for the Palestinians, which commonly equates to being “Pro-Hamas,” at least according to the media.
Responses to controversy at Harvard not only demonstrate the regime’s effectiveness but also the clear cognitive dissonance certain demographics can’t overcome.
Perspective on Threads
Browsing Mark Zuckerburg’s Threads, the narrative over Zionism and Israel’s recent actions is reliant on DEI. Anti-Zionist Jews claim it is all “White supremacy” in agreement with their other minority counterparts.
Others suggest it is White Christians that are to blame, looping in Catholics who are against Zionism since the time of Pope Pius X.
The leftwing categorizes the (Semitic) Jews as White or “White-adjacent” and thus oppressors. That is possibly why, among Gen Z Americans, support for Israel continues to decline.
The departure of Gay isn’t a big win, particularly because Zionism was only targeted as being viewed as “White imperialism.” If you haven’t been awake for the racial reckoning, only one group has been outlawed for celebrating itself—and what is so ironic is that a significant portion of White conservatives have no idea who is pushing anti-Whitism. It has only fostered frustration and resentment towards minorities, who may not be much to that supposed reckoning force behind DEI but rather just a face and a shield.
Coming back to Gay and her resignation, again, the mainstream right views this as a victory over DEI when the reality is it’s a Zionist win. In fact, the interim president of Harvard, Alan Garber, supports DEI but is now of the correct ethnicity to support Zionism.
On the DEI issue, NGOs, the media and Hollywood are looking “correct” to include Jews, ensuring absolutely no criticism of Zionism and leaving one group absent.
Disillusion on the Right
Con Inc. yet again fooled the mainstream right. Conservative commentators, journalists and media outlets attacked Gay to resign allegedly for her DEI background, which now includes antisemitism. The plagiarism was just the icing on the cake.
Zionist Jews for years have remained silent on the discrimination against Whites at the hand of DEI, particularly in academia. It was only when the diversity mob criticized Zionism and the State of Israel that it became problematic.
Under the DEI lens, the situation in Gaza is “White supremacist imperialism,” according to left-wing activists. Even with the controversy surrounding Gay and the overall disapproval of Israel, there is truly little backlash against Zionist Jews. Instead, the left’s reasoning vastly targets Christian Whites.
Of course, the diffusing narratives have manipulated the Zionist win into a conservative win over DEI. That is far from the case. As previously mentioned, Harvard’s interim president supports DEI. The mainstream right is so naive to the Zionists and their overall in-group bias, which places their own agenda well ahead of America’s.
The masses will continue to ignore this problem and also the fact that a large swatch of DEI instructors and advocating NGOs are Jewish Zionists. The media won’t cover these topics, but when it becomes aware of the criticism, there are automatic claims of “antisemitism.” The cry before the impact silences the discourse and essentially holds Jewish people as the highest protected class, well above minorities included under the DEI umbrella, as exemplified by Gay’s forced resignation.
Republicans such as Sen. Mike Lee of Utah and presidential candidate Gov. Ron DeSantis cozy up to the DEI-antisemitism narrative in order to get a footing with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Lee and DeSantis prioritize securing their donors over true conservatism and advocating for their constituents.
The posts above demonstrate it pretty clearly. “Based” Mike Lee has never said a word about DEI’s apparent anti-Whitism, but now says it’s antisemitic. Meanwhile, DeSantis is now pushing for a special affirmative action for Jewish students. The neocon is essentially expanding upon DEI.
How doesn’t anyone find this to be completely bizarre?
Most people remain silent because of the “greatest ally” narrative, along with the intense sensitivity around the Jewish people. For example, Marty [REDACTED], a Texas to New York boomer, told Paleocon Publishing, “I’ve never seen anything like this,” adding, “This isn’t America anymore.” The 60-some-odd-year-old man was timid about acknowledging the Zionist role in many of these recent predicaments, claiming “corrupt politicians.”
Paleocon Publishing pressed the gentleman with empirical evidence to which his face changed color. “I don’t want no part of this,” he stated, “But why them?”
But Why Them?
According to inside sources, DEI was brought about by 12 people: Judith Katz, Elise Cross, Sybil Evans, Lee Gardenswartz, Lewis Griggs, Ed Hubbard, Fred Miller, Patricia Pope, Ann Rowe, Donna Spring and Roosevelt Thomas. These forerunners of the race industry include Hispanics, blacks, Whites and an overrepresented amount of Jewish Zionists.
Paleocon Publishing reached out to several of these DEI specialists, who either refused to speak or didn’t return the message. Almost every one of those 12 run consulting groups reaping off of accused “White privilege” and “systemic racism.”
Frankly, it’s disgusting.
Judith Katz of The Kaleel Jamison Consulting Group, one of the 12, writes books on “inclusion” and “diversity.” Her latest publication is White Awareness: Handbook for Anti-Racism Training. She also wrote an essay on “White Culture” for PPS.net.
Katz is very much involved in DEI. She was a former Advocacy Board member at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, where she is celebrated for her work in “creating an inclusive culture.” She currently sits on the Dean’s Council, College of Education and serves as the Board of Trustees of Fielding Graduate University.
There isn’t a firm connection to deem her a Zionist, but would it be a stretch? The trouble with finding her information is that there is another woman of the exact name—a lesbian Jewish author. It also appears that these 12 particular individuals keep their personal backgrounds close to the chest.
Zionist NGOs Promoting DEI
There are just too many examples to point to, so let’s look at Reform Judaism. It calls itself a “Religious Action Center,” while at its core promoting “racial equality, diversity & inclusion.” It claims that:
Judaism and social justice are inseparable. The pursuit of justice is not an elective we can shrug off as optional; the Torah literally tells us, ‘Justice, justice, you shall pursue’ (Deut. 16:20).
A major component of this is ensuring that all our Jewish communal spaces are affirming for all Jews and their loved ones, something which we – both as the Reform Jewish community and as a broader Jewish community – have not yet achieved. We can further advance toward this vision by learning and implementing three core principles/practices: diversity, inclusion, and equity.
Reform Judaism has several branches, including the Association of Reform Zionists of America (ARZA), which preaches equality, democracy, pluralism and Israel.
ARZA states on its webpage that its mission is to center a connection to Israel in the American Reform community and strengthen the movement on the ground in Israel. So, it is essentially a progressive Jewish Zionist nonprofit that supports DEI.
The purpose of pointing this out is to demonstrate who is in control. Arguably, most mainstream conservatives believe DEI is a black agenda formed within their community. But that couldn’t be further from the truth—they are merely pawns.
DEI will eventually include Jews, leaving Christian Whites out. It’s just a fact based on who is dolling out the victim cards. And remember, antisemitism is allegedly widespread on college campuses. DEI was never taking any punches after the forced resignation of Claudine Gay; it is to be expanded.
For now, the DEI traction in media will just create more animosity between Whites and blacks—nothing more. People’s optics are too skewed by corporate media and academia to really see the truth. Even if such a conversation were to arise, it is nearly impossible to get past the cognitive dissonance on both sides of the political aisle.